Define the intended benefit
Name what tourism should contribute, who should benefit, and what the city will not trade away. Record the decision owner and what would change the answer.
How it works
A shared evidence-to-decision cycle for city tourism.
Tourism Room brings scattered evidence, local priorities and known gaps into one governed record for a small number of city tourism decisions.
Hear affected perspectives
Bring in the people the decision affects, including residents and local operators. Preserve disagreement. Identify perspectives that have not yet been heard.
Examine the evidence
Combine approved city intelligence, public evidence, and relevant specialist analysis. Keep sources, differing views, known gaps, confidence, and limitations visible.
Choose an action
Give each decision a posture: Fix, Test, Protect, Monitor, or Data needed. Record the next action, the owner, and the conditions that would stop or change it.
Review results
Repeat the approved method on the agreed date. Record movement, confounders, and whether the evidence supports progress, no change, or an inconclusive result.
Adapt
Keep the record. Change the action, the measures, or the question. An improvement in AI mentions alone does not establish local benefit.
The retained record
Define. Hear. Examine. Choose. Review. Adapt.
Tourism Room preserves what the city knew, whose views were heard, what remained unanswered, what it decided, who owned the action, and what the next comparable measure established. It does not call correlation causal proof.
Inspect the methodology →