Example programme · Lantana City

What a 90-day review can show a sponsor.

Lantana City is an anonymized scenario. The figures show how a review can look. They are not a measured city result. A purchase in the example is not proof of extra local income.

Anonymized scenarioQ3 2026Not a measured city result

Current decision room

Lantana City

Q3 2026Method 2.1.0
Example result
Participation
20 businesses, one hotel, one tour partner
Completed purchases
Reconciled in this scenario
Refunds
Recorded
Net business receipts
After disclosed fees and refunds
Delivery effort
Tracked beside the totals
Additional local income
Not assumed from a purchase
Decision question

Can Lantana add one more local experience in its market district, and show who benefited?

Continue the market-district programme. In this scenario, completed purchases are reconciled, the concentration check holds, and the resident halt was not used.

Current postureMonitorConfidence: medium
Conditions and disagreement
  • Continue the programme. Keeps a working cohort and a comparable next measure, without treating the scenario as a citywide result.
  • Redesign where receipts concentrated. Protects the agreed share, but delays the partners who already have spare capacity.
  • Stop the programme. Ends the intervention if effort rose without completed purchases, or if the halt was used.
Receipted finding

The scenario programme can continue

Twenty willing businesses have one bookable offer. A hotel and a tour operator introduce suitable experiences through their own booking channels. In the scenario, completed purchases are reconciled, the top five businesses stay inside the agreed share, and the resident halt is not used. Retention is estimated only where the evidence exists.

90-day action

Continue the One More Local Experience programme

Keep the same businesses and partners. Reconcile completed purchases on their existing channels. Stop if the halt is used, if receipts pass the agreed share, or if unpaid delivery work is what grew.

Suggested owner · City tourism strategy lead
Open evidence receiptGrade D
Evidence state
illustrative
Method
Multi-source decision scenario · 2.1.0
Source
Tourism Room multi-source intelligence pack
Collected
2026-07-31

LimitationA live programme requires authorised sponsor, operator, and partner records. This packet is a scenario. AI mentions are not local economic benefit, and unknown retention is not a low score.

Known limitation

Scenario figures are not a measurement. A reconciled purchase shows where the first payment went. It does not prove the purchase was additional, or how much income stayed local.

Next measurement

completed reconciled purchases

2026-10-31 · target to maintain
Data needed

For which participating businesses is locally retained income still unknown, and were the reconciled purchases additional?

Supply-chain, wage, and ownership evidence for the remaining businesses, and a comparison or staggered rollout the sponsor accepts

Lantana City is an anonymized scenario. Figures are not a measured city result.

Complete the proof journey

See how this decision becomes a board-ready brief.

Open decision report